Unlock Massive AUM: The Secret Beyond Numbers

dan solinAdvisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.

Dan’s new book for millennials, Wealthier: The Investing Field Guide for Millennials, is now available on Amazon.

I do extensive research on how people make decisions. One collateral benefit is that it helps me understand my own biases.

I recently moved into a new home and have dealt with many vendors. For one upgrade, I interviewed several suppliers. One was technically superior and was the most expensive. When the representative met with me, I found him arrogant, defensive, and patronizing.

After the meeting, I did additional research and renewed my efforts to find an alternative.

On the merits, I kept returning to the expensive option, but I couldn’t overcome my aversion to the representative. Then, I remembered my research.

I called the company and asked if they could send another representative who would be in charge of my account if we bought their equipment. They readily obliged. The new rep was charming and engaging. I signed up on the spot.

The moral is clear: If a prospect doesn’t like you, they won’t hire you.

Empirical support

A recent study authored by a doctoral student and an Associate Professor in the University of New South Wales psychology department supports this view.

The study sought to determine the impact of expert likability and the quality of expert evidence on jurors’ perceptions of persuasiveness and their subsequent sentencing decisions. It explored how variations in the likability of experts (categorized as low, high, or neutral) and the quality of the expert evidence (low or high) influenced jurors’ ratings of expert credibility, the value of the evidence presented, and the weight given to that evidence in making sentencing choices, like opting for life in prison or the death penalty.