Brea(d)th of Life: Market Leadership Shifts

Record five-day spread between small and large caps

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 7/19/2024.

Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Another tale of two markets

Bifurcation at the cap level is not the only tale of two markets. There is also the bifurcation at the index level vs. the average member level. As shown below, maximum drawdowns have been mild so far this year at the index level. That's because the mega-caps' outperformance has "flattered" cap-weighted indexes. The real drama has been under the surface at the average member level. An extreme case in point is within the Nasdaq: At the index level, the maximum drawdown is a tepid -7%; however, at the average member level, the maximum drawdown is a whopping -40%. After hitting an all-time high on July 10, the Nasdaq has had a 5% pullback at the index level, with the churn under the surface persisting.

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 7/19/2024.

Some members excluded from year-to-date return columns given additions to indices were after January 2024. Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Less halitosis

Better performance away from the prior dominance of mega-cap tech and tech-related stocks resulted in a sharp improvement in market breadth. As shown below, for all three major indexes—particularly the Russell 2000—there was an epic surge in the share of each index's constituents trading above their 200-day moving averages.

Breadth rolls over after huge surge

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 7/19/2024.

Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

In addition, as of the end of last week, 75% of the Russell 2000 was trading at a 20-day high. That matched the prior highest reading (December 2023) in more than three decades. From a sector perspective, three out of the S&P 500's 11 sectors, have more than 70% of stocks trading at 20-day highs: Real Estate, Financials, and Utilities. Those sector biases likely represent a combination of rate-cutting optimism (Real Estate and Financials) and a desire for some defensiveness and yield (Utilities). Bringing up the rear are Consumer Discretionary, Healthcare, and Tech, all below 50% in terms of the share of stocks trading at 20-day highs.

Persistence?

A natural question is whether the broadening out has legs. Historically, moves similar to those over the past couple of weeks bode well for a continuation of the bull market. However, history also shows some consolidation is likely near-term; perhaps reflected in some of the retreat in the ratios shown above.

From a factor (characteristic) perspective, the past month has been rewarding to stocks with higher volatility/variability and greater leverage. Volatility and variability factors have gotten a lift courtesy of the strength of prior laggards, also explaining the momentum and size factors being the worst performers over the past month. Better performance by the leverage factor can be traced to the expectation of rate cuts starting in September, establishing an improving backdrop for more indebted companies.

Profits matter

Another under-performing factor over the past month is profitability as investors shifted some attention away from large caps (with generally better profit profiles) to small caps (with generally weaker profit profiles). As shown in the chart below, the year-over-year change in the S&P 500's forward earnings per share (EPS) turned positive late last year. Since then, it has climbed well into double-digit territory, helping underpin the large-cap rally.

It's taken much longer for the Russell 2000's forward EPS to climb over the hill; in fact, it was only a few months ago when its year-over-year growth finally turned positive. Expectations have downshifted again, due to a mix of base effects, the Russell 2000's annual rebalancing, and a pullback in analysts' confidence around earnings.

Large-cap EPS pulling ahead

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 7/19/2024.

Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

We have been emphasizing the difficulty of looking at "the market" as a monolith—be it at the large- or small-cap levels. Concentration has made that a difficult exercise for the S&P 500, since nearly 40% of its market cap is made up by just 10 companies. Profitability has made it a difficult exercise for the Russell 2000, since about 40% of members in the index have no earnings on a trailing 12-month basis.

There are ample opportunities within the small cap space, but we would caveat that with a recommendation to stay up in quality, notably by focusing on factors like profitability and high interest coverage ratios. Unfortunately, at the index level, the Russell 2000 is not always going to reflect the strength of those companies. That is evidenced by the fact that profitable companies in the index have been outperforming non-profitable companies by nearly 19% over the past year, as shown below.

Profitable small caps outperforming

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 7/19/2024.

Profitable companies have trailing 12-month earnings per share greater than $0. Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Mind the index profitability gap

Our bias toward profitability is why we often gear investors toward the S&P 600 small cap index as a source for ideas, given it has a profitability filter. Given that, the index has a much tamer forward P/E compared to the Russell 2000's, which is distorted by poor earnings data. It also looks much better relative to the large cap S&P 500, as shown below. The spread between their forward P/Es is near its widest since late 2021 (and before that, mid-2001)—meaning large caps are incredibly expensive relative to small caps.

Small caps' huge discount

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 7/19/2024.

Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The valuation discount suggests small caps are attractive relative to large caps, but it doesn't necessarily mean they will outperform in earnest. Case in point: Since the December 2021 peak P/E spread, the S&P 500 has outperformed the S&P 600 by nearly 17%; yet, since the peak spread in December 2000, the S&P 600 is up by 618% while the S&P 500 is up by 278%.

In sum

It's premature to assume the broadening out and leadership shifts which have occurred over the past couple of weeks have longer-term legs. The rotation has been driven by profit-taking (following massive profits) in the prior mega-cap winners and a hefty dose of short-covering among the prior laggards. In the case of the latter, it was often the case that short-covering drove higher those market segments which had been long-term underperformers; that in-and-of-itself should not be a cause for concern.

We remain constructive on high-quality small caps, but we use the evidence above to manage investors' expectations when it comes to performance. Using lingo often tied to traders, we would suggest "fading" the lower-quality segments of small caps, while "leaning in" to the higher-quality segments. A significant valuation discount may be supportive for small caps in general, but for now the weaker profitability profile represents a valid explanation. So, although the valuation discount is compelling, it is not necessarily a catalyst for continued outperformance, at least not until the broad earnings profile for small caps turns higher.

About the Authors

Liz Ann Sonders, Managing Director, Chief Investment Strategist

Liz Ann Sonders has a range of investment strategy responsibilities, from market and economic analysis to investor education, all focused on the individual investor.

A keynote speaker at numerous company and industry conferences, Liz Ann is regularly quoted in financial publications including The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, Barron's, and the Financial Times, and she appears as a regular guest on CNBC, Bloomberg, CNN, CBS News, Yahoo! Finance, and Fox Business News programs. Liz Ann has been named "Best Market Strategist" by Kiplinger's Personal Finance and one of SmartMoney magazine's "Power 30." Barron's has named her to its "100 Most Influential Women in Finance" every year since the list's inception, and Investment Advisor has included her on the "IA 25," its list of the 25 most important people in and around the financial advisory profession. Liz Ann has also been named to Forbes' 50 Over 50.

In 1999, Liz Ann joined U.S. Trust—which was acquired by Schwab in 2000—as a managing director and member of its Investment Policy Committee. Previously, Liz Ann was a managing director and senior portfolio manager at Avatar Associates, an original division of the Zweig/Avatar Group. She holds an MBA in Finance from the Gabelli School of Business at Fordham University and a B.A. in Economics and Political Science from the University of Delaware.

Kevin Gordon, Director, Senior Investment Strategist

Kevin Gordon serves as the research associate for Schwab's Chief Investment Strategist Liz Ann Sonders. In addition to providing analysis on the U.S. economy and stock market for Schwab's clients, he helps develop deep-dive projects as well as content for Schwab's public website, internal business partners, and social media outlets. Kevin is a frequent guest on CNBC, Yahoo! Finance, Bloomberg TV, and CBS News, and has been quoted in The New York Times, Forbes, MarketWatch, CNN, The Wall Street Journal, and Bloomberg.

Prior to joining Schwab in 2019, Kevin gained experience in asset allocation research at an investment advisory firm, and worked for a U.S. senator in Washington, D.C. He graduated magna cum laude from Pepperdine University, where he co-managed a student-run investment fund and co-authored academic publications on politics and the economy. Kevin is currently an MBA candidate at New York University's Stern School of Business. He holds a B.A. in Economics and Political Science from Pepperdine University.

Kevin is a member of the President’s Advisory Council for Almost Home Kids affiliated with Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago.

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision.

All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions. Data contained herein from third-party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. Examples provided are for illustrative purposes only and not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance.

Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.

The policy analysis provided by the Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., does not constitute and should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any political party.

Performance may be affected by risks associated with non-diversification, including investments in specific countries or sectors. Additional risks may also include, but are not limited to, investments in foreign securities, especially emerging markets, real estate investment trusts (REITs), fixed income, municipal securities including state specific municipal securities, small capitalization securities and commodities. Each individual investor should consider these risks carefully before investing in a particular security or strategy.

All corporate names and market data shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not a recommendation, offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Supporting documentation for any claims or statistical information is available upon request.

Diversification strategies do not ensure a profit and do not protect against losses in declining markets.

Schwab does not recommend the use of technical analysis as a sole means of investment research.

The information and content provided herein is general in nature and is for informational purposes only. It is not intended, and should not be construed, as a specific recommendation, individualized tax, legal, or investment advice. Tax laws are subject to change, either prospectively or retroactively. Where specific advice is necessary or appropriate, individuals should contact their own professional tax and investment advisors or other professionals (CPA, Financial Planner, Investment Manager) to help answer questions about specific situations or needs prior to taking any action based upon this information.

Small-cap stocks are subject to greater volatility than those in other asset categories.

Please note that this content was created as of the specific date indicated and reflects the author's views as of that date. It will be kept solely for historical purposes, and the author's opinions may change, without notice, in reaction to shifting economic, business, and other conditions.

Source: Bloomberg Index Services Limited. BLOOMBERG^® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively "Bloomberg"). Bloomberg or Bloomberg's licensors own all proprietary rights in the Bloomberg Indices. Neither Bloomberg nor Bloomberg's licensors approves or endorses this material or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.

Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs, and expenses, and cannot be invested in directly. For additional information, please see schwab.com/indexdefinitions.

0724-F0XT

---

A message from Advisor Perspectives and VettaFi: To learn more about this and other topics, check out our podcasts.

© Charles Schwab

More Municipal Bonds Topics >