Emerging Markets: High Growth does not mean High Returns

Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.

A list of Dan Richards’ previous articles appears at the end of this article.

Dan Richards

Historically, people invested in emerging markets for two reasons – for higher returns and diversification.

Last week’s column examined some new research, suggesting that while there were some diversification benefits to adding emerging markets to a developed market portfolio, those benefits have shrunk over the past while.

Recent research also explores the return payoff of investing in emerging markets such as Brazil, Russia, India and China.  Contrary to popular beliefs, investing in high-growth emerging markets has produced inferior returns to those obtained from slower growth economies.

Historically, many practices in fields such as medicine, teaching and investing were articles of faith – things were done because they made sense on the surface and because they’d “always been done that way.”

In the past forty years, those fields have seen an accelerating shift to an “evidence-based” approach, looking at hard data to evaluate the conventional thinking on which decisions were historically made.

The father of evidence-based thinking in medicine is Archie Cochrane, a Scottish doctor who first wrote about this concept in the early 1970s – and evidence-based decision making is among the elements of the new Obama health care program that hopes to reduce spending by eliminating low-payoff treatments.

Economic growth and emerging markets

Fueled by access to better information and the explosion of processing power, the evidence-based approach has spread into investing, replacing anecdotal observations with careful examination of data.

In 2002, Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh and Mike Staunton of the London Business School published Triumph of the Optimists: 101 years of Global Investment Returns. Looking at a century of returns, the book provided an in depth analysis of 16 countries, all but one of them in the developed world – the exception was South Africa.

The authors analyzed total returns and the long-term equity risk premium and showed that some historical indexes overstate long-term performance because they are contaminated by survivorship bias and that long-term returns for most countries are seriously overestimated due to a focus on periods that with hindsight are known to have been successful.

In 2005, the three turned their attention to whether faster growing economies translate into superior returns for investors.

They first examined the connection between high growth economies and emerging markets, looking at the rate of economic growth in 53 countries and ranking these countries from the fastest growing to the slowest growing.

They confirmed that emerging markets tend to be faster growing. Of the 11 fastest growing economies at the end of 2004, all but one were emerging market countries.  Of the 11 lowest growth economies eight were more mature developed markets.