Kellyanne Conway: How the Democrats Blew It

Donald Trump’s electoral win was in part the result of very shrewd analysis and tactics. As his campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway was responsible for Trump’s campaign strategy and its execution. Yesterday, she offered candid insights into the key decisions that led to Trump’s victory.

Conway was named Trump’s campaign manager on August 17, and became the first woman to run a successful presidential campaign. She is also president and CEO of The Polling Company, Inc., a market research company that has served mostly Republican candidates. She spoke at the MarketCounsel Summit in Miami.

“The Democrats presumed who the electorate would be,” Conway said, “rather than letting the electorate tell them.”

Conway said Democrats made a number of faulty assumptions throughout the campaign. They assumed that Hillary Clinton would be able to hold on to the demographic coalition that Barack Obama rode to victory. But it turned out, she said, that millennials and people of color did not turn out and vote for her in the same numbers as Obama.

Tied into that, Democrats assumed that 2016 would look like 2012. But Conway said that her team saw the opportunity for Trump to attract a greater number of self-identified independent voters than in the prior cycle.

In prior elections, Republicans had waited for single people to marry and younger voters to age in order to grow their base, according to Conway. But she saw the chance to attract voters who were unhappy with Obamacare or were fearful of terrorism and their security. She said her team relied on three sets of data to identify potential voters: traditional data, data collected by the Republican National Committee (RNC) and their own propriety analysis that tapped into how voters spent their money and time. She called the latter of those three “situational analysis,” and said it was significantly more important than traditional demographic data.

The effectiveness of Conway’s strategy was apparent in a key statistic. Clinton got only about 55% of female voters, which she said was “astounding,” since it was a mere 1% greater than what Obama received. “Women found that they didn’t share her values and were disconnected,” Conway said.

“Voters had been telling pollsters for decades that they wanted an outsider,” Conway said. “The voters made good on that 30-year self-avowed desire. Clinton didn’t represent change.”

The Democrat who represented change was Bernie Sanders, and Conway faulted Clinton for not treating him and his supporters better. She said that Democrats effectively ignored the fact that he had carried 22 states in the primaries. Nonetheless, Conway said it would have been easier if Sanders had won the nomination and she could have run against the first socialist instead of the first woman candidate.