The World Is Transitioning to American Oil From Saudi Crude

Picture the scene: Weeks after the world came together at the COP28 summit with a deal for “transitioning away from fossil fuels,” Saudi Arabia, the oil industry’s flagship producer, cancels a planned increase in its crude output capabilities. On paper, it’s the stuff climate activists dream about.

No so fast.

First, the details. On Tuesday, Saudi Aramco, the state-owned oil giant, announced it was abandoning a plan worth several dozen billion dollars to boost its production capacity — with the emphasis on capacity — to 13 million barrels a day, from 12 million barrels currently. Due to OPEC+ output cuts, Riyadh is well below its maximum output potential, currently pumping about 9 million barrels a day.1

The cancellation, only months before the first of a series of oil field expansions was due to come on stream, was at the behest of the Saudi government, which by law sets what’s known as the maximum sustainable capacity, or MSC. The financial details of the cancellation are unclear, although it’s likely to save Aramco somewhere between $20 billion and $40 billion in capital expenditures over the next five years.

Yet much of the buildup underpinning the increase in production capacity was already underway, including the expansion of several oil fields: Dammam (set to add 75,000 barrels a day starting this year), Berri (250,000 barrels from 2025), Marjan (300,000 barrels from 2025) and Zuluf (600,000 barrels from 2026). Only the expansion of the Safaniya oil field, slated for 2027 with 700,000 barrels a day extra, hasn't started.

Currently, Aramco plans to continue to build the four projects it had already started, thus avoiding a writedown. The projects would add 1.25 million barrels a day of additional potential. But Aramco can offset the increase and keep its maximum capacity unchanged by letting output in other more mature fields decline more quickly than it had previously planned.