Who Owns Your Marketing Process?

Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.

Financial advisors have more ways than ever to take marketing work off their plates. You can hire a writer for articles, automate email campaigns, schedule social posts weeks in advance, outsource design, and use AI to help with drafting and repurposing content.

Each of those things can save time. Yet an advisor can outsource much of the actual production and still spend a surprising amount of time keeping their marketing moving.

Consider a single article. A writer drafts it. The advisor reviews it. Compliance approves it. Someone builds the email, and a social media vendor creates posts to promote it.

Each person may handle their part efficiently. But unless someone owns the process as a whole, the advisor is still likely to give the writer direction, track the draft, send it to compliance, make sure revisions happen, and coordinate distribution.

The individual tasks have owners. The marketing process does not.

The Coordination Work Gets More Expensive as You Grow

A firm that once sent an occasional newsletter may eventually have articles, videos, social media, events, segmented client emails, lead-nurture campaigns, print pieces, and multiple vendors or platforms supporting them.

More marketing doesn't just mean more production. It also means there is more planning, tracking, reviewing, and schedule management.

That work represents a real marketing cost, even if it never appears on an invoice. Kitces Research puts that number at 68% of total marketing costs in 2026.¹

The cost of that time also increases as a firm grows. Kitces estimated the soft cost of an advisor's marketing time at about $30 per hour for startup firms, $134 for growing firms, and $351 for scaling firms.²

Early on, spending an afternoon working on marketing may be a perfectly reasonable use of an advisor's available capacity. As a firm matures, that same afternoon competes with client meetings, business development, and other work that depends more directly on the advisor.

Marketing may still be producing results. The problem is that the firm can no longer afford to have the advisor running so much of it.

Making Marketing Faster Doesn't Assign Responsibility for It

Technology can reduce the amount of work involved in individual marketing tasks. Automations can eliminate manual steps. Integrations can move information between platforms. AI can help create first drafts or repurpose existing material for different channels.

All of that can make individual marketing tasks faster, but it doesn't address who is responsible for keeping the larger process coordinated and moving.

Suppose an advisor records a five-minute video. A transcription tool creates the transcript, AI helps produce a first draft of an article, and the firm's writer edits it. Social scheduling software makes distribution easier, and email automation handles parts of the follow-up.

The firm has made several tasks faster, but it still needs someone to be responsible for turning its marketing priorities into a production plan, keeping the work on schedule, managing review and compliance, and making sure campaigns are completed.

What’s missing is a marketing integration owner: one person with explicit responsibility for making sure the marketing system works as a whole.

This person doesn't have to do all the marketing work. Writers can write. Vendors can manage their specialties. Technology can automate individual tasks. The advisor can remain involved where their expertise, judgment, relationships, or presence are needed. The integration owner's job is to make sure all of that work operates as one marketing system.

The Integration Owner Should Fit the Firm

Giving the marketing system an owner doesn't mean you have to hire a marketing director. The integration owner is a function, not necessarily a job title. Depending on the firm, it could be the advisor, a virtual assistant, a marketing agency partner, a fractional marketing director, or an internal hire.

And the role can change over time.

A firm struggling to send a newsletter consistently doesn't need the same level of marketing support as a firm coordinating several vendors, campaigns, events, and content channels. A firm with a mature marketing operation but an advisor buried in reviews and production decisions has a different problem.

As the marketing operation develops, both who should own it and what they need to own change with it.

Stage 1: When Marketing Is Ad Hoc, Start by Defining Ownership

At the earliest stage, the problem usually isn't complexity as much as it is consistency.

A newsletter goes out when the advisor has time. Social media posts come in spurts. Several weeks or months can pass without a new blog post, and there isn't a definite plan for what's coming next.

At this stage, the advisor may still be the right person for the integration owner role.

The immediate need is to establish a basic marketing process: maintain the newsletter schedule, prepare layouts, schedule social posts, track compliance submissions, and make sure existing-client nurture communications happen consistently.

Treating integration as a defined responsibility separates two kinds of work the advisor is doing. As the advisor, they provide the substance: recording ideas, capturing recurring client questions, and noting topics that resonate in meetings. As the integration owner, they turn those inputs into a predictable marketing schedule.

For a smaller firm, consciously separating those responsibilities may be enough to create a workable system. As the volume of marketing grows, the integration role can begin moving to someone else.

Stage 2: When Marketing Becomes Disconnected, Someone Else May Need to Run the System

As firms add vendors, tools, and channels, coordination gets more complex.

There may now be a writer, an email platform, a social media vendor, an event program, and several other tools or specialists. Plenty of marketing is happening, but the advisor is still the only person with visibility across all of it.

The integration role now requires more than simply maintaining a schedule. Someone needs to manage the operation: maintaining a common project plan, coordinating existing vendors, systematizing segmented client emails and event follow-up, and evaluating which vendor and tool relationships should be kept, consolidated, or eliminated.

For a client event, for example, the advisor might choose the topic and audience, and host the event. The integration owner manages the promotion, tracks compliance approval, oversees registrations and reminders, and runs the follow-up process.

The advisor can still make the key decisions about the event and be actively involved in the marketing itself. What comes off their plate is coordinating the people, platforms, deadlines, and follow-up required to make it happen.

Stage 3: When Marketing Is Consistent but the Advisor Is the Bottleneck, Expand the Integration Owner's Role

Eventually, a firm may have reliable marketing and clear processes, but still find that too much work gets held up with the advisor.

Articles are published regularly. Emails go out. Events have established promotion schedules. Social posts are planned in advance.

But drafts wait for the advisor’s review. Approvals stack up. The advisor is still creating too much from scratch or making routine production decisions that someone else could make.

At this stage, the integration owner needs enough marketing expertise and authority to take on more of the routine production, as well. They might ghostwrite from advisor-recorded source material, develop lead nurture sequences, prepare event invitations and segmented campaigns, maintain performance reports, and make routine production decisions without bringing each one back to the advisor.

The advisor still provides the ideas, expertise, direction, and required approvals, but they no longer need to be involved in every step of turning those inputs into finished marketing.

The Advisor Still Has a Vital Role in Marketing

Giving someone else ownership of the marketing system doesn't remove the advisor from marketing. Some parts of marketing still depend directly on the advisor.

That includes creating the source material the rest of the system draws from. The advisor can record video or audio content, talk through ideas a writer can develop, have referral and COI conversations, and personally reach out to top clients.

The same applies when clients and prospects expect the advisor's presence. An integration owner can promote a webinar, manage registrations, and handle follow-up, but the advisor still leads the webinar. Someone else can manage the logistics for a client-appreciation event, but the advisor still needs to be in the room.

Strategic decisions also remain with the advisor. They should determine the firm's niche, set priorities, make major brand and voice decisions, decide what AI is allowed to touch, hold vendors accountable, and provide final compliance approval. Someone else can manage the workflows surrounding those decisions without actually making the decisions.

Rather than minimizing the advisor's involvement, the goal is to reserve that involvement for the parts of marketing that actually require the advisor.

Look for the Work That Keeps Coming Back to You

If marketing is taking more of your time than it should, look at the work that repeatedly finds its way back to you: following up with a writer, checking on compliance, keeping campaigns on schedule, managing vendors, or making routine production decisions.

Then ask: Am I doing this because it requires me, or because nobody else is responsible for making sure it gets done?

If it's the latter, don't immediately look for another tool to automate the task or another specialist to perform it. Look at the larger process around it. Who is responsible for making sure the people, tools, approvals, and deadlines come together and the work actually gets completed?

That's the role a marketing integration owner is meant to fill.

That ownership doesn’t necessarily require building an internal marketing team. For many advisory firms, an outside marketing partner can take responsibility for coordinating the work while the advisor stays involved where their expertise and decisions are actually needed.

Sources

^1. https://www.kitces.com/kitces-report-financial-planner-advisor-marketing-tactics-strategies-referrals-centers-influence-networking/

^2. https://www.kitces.com/blog/marketing-scale-growth-advisory-firm-cost-capacity-crossroads-strategies/

Crystal Lee Butler, MBA, is the founder and marketing strategist behind Crystal Marketing Solutions (CMS), a premier done-for-you virtual marketing agency dedicated to niche advisors, solo advisors, and small advisory teams. With two decades of experience, CMS excels in developing personalized marketing strategies that streamline and execute all aspects of their clients' marketing ecosystem. Visit crystalmarketingsolutions.com to learn more.

This material has been edited with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools. The information presented is based on sources believed to be reliable and accurate at the time of publication. This material is for educational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect the views of the author, presenter, or affiliated organizations.

A message from Advisor Perspectives and VettaFi: Discover something new! Click here to register for our upcoming webcasts.