The Value of the U.S. Dollar: Where to Next?

While in office, President Truman famously displayed the statement, “The Buck stops here” on his desk. At that time, he wasn’t talking about the U.S. dollar, but rather conveying that he accepted responsibility for how the nation was governed.

Some 60 years later, the newest U.S. president might have a slightly different version on his desk: “Has the Buck stopped?” A subtitle could read:

‘Or does the Buck’s bull run that started in June 2014 continue?’ [1]

Investors are wondering what the newest administration’s economic policies might mean for the direction of the nation’s currency.

The value of the U.S. dollar rallied after the November election[2] based on investors’ beliefs that the new administration’s policies of infrastructure investment, tax overhaul, and other stimulus plans would lead to growth and a stronger dollar. That bullish dollar move contrasted with statements from the president and other officials in the new year saying the dollar was too strong, at least in relation to some trading partners. Currency traders hesitated, uncertain about the confusion of statements that conflict with proposed policies that would seem to be bullish for the dollar. [3]

Key among those policies is the border-adjustment tax which could trigger a substantial rise in the dollar. Here’s why:

This tax involves a 20% tax added to imports and a 20% decrease of tax on exports. If enacted, the tax on imports would induce U.S. consumers to buy fewer imported goods. That would likely reduce the demand for foreign currency to pay for those goods thus probably causing those currencies to fall in value relative to the U.S. dollar.

Foreign consumers would likely experience the opposite effect: those consumers would want to buy more of the cheaper U.S. goods, paying for those goods in U.S. dollars. The decline in U.S. demand for foreign currency coupled with the increased demand for dollars from foreign consumers would cause the dollar’s value to rise about 25%.[4]

Of course, this border-adjustment tax hasn’t been enacted yet. The U.S. Congress must approve the proposed tax, and there are mixed opinions about the likelihood of that happening.[5]

Those U.S. firms that are large importers such as retailers feel their customers would suffer greatly while U.S. exporters would enjoy a substantial benefit from the subsidized prices. This situation is very likely to result in lots of lobbying from importers and exporters trying to argue the worthiness of their respective causes to Congress.

Congress must also consider that the border tax won’t happen in a vacuum. Other nations could respond with retaliatory import duties, effectively reducing or eliminating the benefit of the lower export cost and a boost to the dollar. Such a retaliation could cause global trade to decline possibly contributing to a worldwide slowdown that could lead to recession.[6]

Besides fiscal effects, dollar watchers also must contend with monetary developments. The Fed raised interest rates on March 15 and the dollar dropped 1%.[7]

A president’s economic policies with Congressional approval and assistance can have a substantial effect on the dollar’s course. It’s unclear whether the full extent of the current president’s policies can be implemented, and if so, whether they’ll have the intended effect. One thing for certain, however, is that the Buck won’t stop. It’s just unclear whether the next move is up or down.

For more on our thoughts about currency, please see our research here.


These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and are current as of the date at the top of the page.

Investing involves risk and principal loss is possible.

Past performance does not guarantee future performance.

This material is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation to purchase any security. Nothing contained in this material is intended to constitute legal, tax, securities or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type.

The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax and investment advice from a licensed professional. The information, analysis and opinions expressed herein are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual entity.

Please remember that all investments carry some level of risk. Although steps can be taken to help reduce risk it cannot be completely removed. They do not not typically grow at an even rate of return and may experience negative growth. As with any type of portfolio structuring, attempting to reduce risk and increase return could, at certain times, unintentionally reduce returns. They do no not typically grow at an even rate of return and may experience negative growth. As with any type of portfolio structuring, attempting to reduce risk and increase return could, at certain times, unintentionally reduce returns.

Non-US markets entail different risks than those typically associated with U.S. markets, including currency fluctuations, political and economic instability, accounting changes, and foreign taxation. Securities may be less liquid and more volatile.

Russell Investments’ ownership is composed of a majority stake held by funds managed by TA Associates with minority stakes held by funds managed by Reverence Capital Partners and Russell Investments’ management.

Frank Russell Company is the owner of the Russell trademarks contained in this material and all trademark rights related to the Russell trademarks, which the members of the Russell Investments group of companies are permitted to use under license from Frank Russell Company. The members of the Russell Investments group of companies are not affiliated in any manner with Frank Russell Company or any entity operating under the “FTSE RUSSELL” brand.

Copyright © Russell Investments 2017. All rights reserved.

This material is proprietary and may not be reproduced, transferred, or distributed in any form without prior written permission from Russell Investments. It is delivered on an “as is” basis without warranty.

UNI – 11021

[3] Source: “Dollar Caught Between President Trump’s Tough Talk, Policy Plans”, Wall Street Journal. February 1, 2017.

[4] Source: “How America’s border-adjusted corporate tax would work.” The Economist. February 13, 2017.

[5] Source: “Trump, GOP At Odds Over 'Border Adjustment' Tax.” NPR, Weekend Edition. February 11, 2017.

[6] Source: “Why Trump’s ‘Big Border Tax’ Gets Taken Seriously: QuickTake Q&A.” January 18, 2017.

© Russell Investments

Read more commentaries by Russell Investments