The Counterargument: Why We Believe Giving up on Europe in Favor of the U.S. Is Wrong

In a recent blog post by BlackRock’s Global Chief Investment Strategist Richard Turnill, he explains the decision to upgrade their view of U.S. stocks and shift down to neutral on European equities. While we admire the strategists at BlackRock and other industry pundits who share this view, we respectfully disagree.

The main argument Mr. Turnill brings to the table for the upgrade is higher U.S. earnings growth momentum, as evidenced by a sharp acceleration in analyst earnings upgrades. He reasons that this trend—underpinned by strong fundamentals coming from robust economic growth and fiscal stimulus—will fuel equity-market returns going forward. And since the U.S. is displaying the strongest acceleration and Europe the weakest, he upgrades the former and downgrades the latter.

Cause for celebration or cause for concern?

Now, it is undeniable that U.S. earnings growth has been strong and that equity analysts have revised up their expectations significantly. But in our opinion, this is more cause for concern than celebration. If we take a closer look at the chart of the week in the blog post—and we show Mr. Turnill’s smoothed earnings revision ratio and add the unsmoothed ratio, as well as more history—it becomes clear just how extreme this past upgrade cycle has been. In fact, in the second chart below, we can see that in the past two months, earnings expectations for 2018 have been revised up from 12% to 19.7% growth. To upgrade an equity region after such a cycle, knowing that the hurdle for positive earnings surprises has just increased tremendously, runs counter to our beliefs. Especially since the revisions ratio does not have a great track record as a leading indicator of equity-market returns.

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream, 02/09/2018

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream, 02/12/2018. I/B/E/S:
Institutional Brokers’ Estimate System

We also struggle with Mr. Turnill’s assessment of the fundamentals and valuation. Although the total amount of U.S. fiscal stimulus is significant, it does not come without a cost. In a country without much spare capacity, an unfunded fiscal boost to economic growth will increase inflation, not to mention the budget deficit. This has already caused rates to move higher, with expectations closing in on three U.S. Federal Reserve (the Fed) rate hikes in 2018. Mr. Turnill mentions the risk this poses to valuation multiples, but fails to mention how much of the returns in U.S. equity markets over the past three years can be attributed to them.

In the chart below, we decompose the returns for U.S. equities into dividends, earnings growth and change in valuation. The chart clearly shows the majority of return has come from a change in valuation, which the recent sell-off did not really impact at all. As a result, we take the risk of higher inflation, interest rates and monetary policy uncertainty much more seriously. Especially because a significant part of the higher earnings call is really an implicit weak dollar call that could go in reverse if the Fed becomes more hawkish.

Source: MSCI USA index

It doesn’t stop there. It wasn’t for nothing that the recent sell-off started with the news that U.S. wage growth had accelerated more than expected. If inflation picks up due to higher wage growth, the associated margin pressures will hit earnings expectations hard. At a time when record-high profit margins are priced by equity markets as if they will remain in place almost forever, there is a real risk of disappointment.

A closer look at Europe

Now contrast all this with Europe. Valuations are neutral and returns have been driven by dividends and earnings growth, as opposed to valuation changes (see second chart below). Monetary policy is expansionary and expected to stay that way for the foreseeable future. Economic growth is strong, and with plenty of spare capacity available, inflation risk is virtually nonexistent. Margins are expanding. Europe may lack the sugar high of a large fiscal stimulus, but both in terms of return potential as well as risk, in our opinion it is superior. Even its underperformance over the past year—driven in large part by the strong euro and a smaller weight in IT—is a positive, because of the better starting point it offers.

We recognize that difference in opinion is what makes a market, but to us, the choice is clear.

Source: MSCI Europe index


These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and are current as of the date at the top of the page.

Investing involves risk and principal loss is possible.

Past performance does not guarantee future performance.

Forecasting represents predictions of market prices and/or volume patterns utilizing varying analytical data. It is not representative of a projection of the stock market, or of any specific investment.

This material is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation to purchase any security. Nothing contained in this material is intended to constitute legal, tax, securities or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type.

The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax and investment advice from a licensed professional. The information, analysis and opinions expressed herein are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual entity.

Please remember that all investments carry some level of risk. Although steps can be taken to help reduce risk it cannot be completely removed. They do no not typically grow at an even rate of return and may experience negative growth. As with any type of portfolio structuring, attempting to reduce risk and increase return could, at certain times, unintentionally reduce returns.

Investments that are allocated across multiple types of securities may be exposed to a variety of risks based on the asset classes, investment styles, market sectors, and size of companies preferred by the investment managers. Investors should consider how the combined risks impact their total investment portfolio and understand that different risks can lead to varying financial consequences, including loss of principal. Please see a prospectus for further details.

Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly.

Source for MSCI data: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed or produced by MSCI.

The MSCI USA Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid-cap segments of the US market. With 637 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in the U.S.

The MSCI Europe Index captures large and mid cap representation across 15 Developed Markets (DM) countries in Europe. With 445 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization across the European Developed Markets equity universe.

Russell Investments’ ownership is composed of a majority stake held by funds managed by TA Associates with minority stakes held by funds managed by Reverence Capital Partners and Russell Investments’ management.

Frank Russell Company is the owner of the Russell trademarks contained in this material and all trademark rights related to the Russell trademarks, which the members of the Russell Investments group of companies are permitted to use under license from Frank Russell Company. The members of the Russell Investments group of companies are not affiliated in any manner with Frank Russell Company or any entity operating under the “FTSE RUSSELL” brand.

Copyright © Russell Investments Group LLC 2018. All rights reserved.

This material is proprietary and may not be reproduced, transferred, or distributed in any form without prior written permission from Russell Investments. It is delivered on an “as is” basis without warranty.


© Russell Investments

Read more commentaries by Russell Investments