Yes, Value Outperformed Growth. But By How Much?
Warren Buffett famously described the stock market as “a device to transfer money from the impatient to the patient.” What he didn’t mention was how much potential wealth could be transferred through disciplined investing.
Over my 50-year career in investing, value has outperformed growth. There have been, and likely will be long, frustrating stretches — lasting for years — where value struggles mightily against flashier growth stocks. Thus, to enjoy value’s outperformance requires a tremendous amount of patience to avoid mistiming the market and missing gains. As the famed investor Jesse Livermore noted, investors "…who can both be right and sit tight are uncommon." Yet the potential reward for sitting tight can be well worth the wait.
We ran the numbers on value versus growth in small-cap securities and were surprised by the extent of the outperformance. Assume a potential $10,000 invested in the Russell 2000 Growth® and Russell 2000 Value® Indices at the start of 1979. By June 2022, the potential investment in the small growth index rose to $460,000 versus small value's $1.46 million. That’s a startling three times as much.
When comparing the performance of the Russell 2000 Value® Index versus the S&P 500 Index, small cap stocks have beaten large caps over the long-term. But as the chart demonstrates, much of the advantage has been derived from small value stocks.
Source: FactSet Research Systems Inc., Monthly data 12/29/1978 to 6/30/2022. The data in this chart represents the cumulative return of $10,000 for the Russell 2000 Value Index versus Russell 2000 Growth Index versus the S&P 500. The inception date for the Russell 2000 Value® Index and Russell 2000 Growth® Index was 12/31/78. All indices are unmanaged. It is not possible to invest in an index. Past performance does not guarantee future results.