Executive summary:
- Most mutual funds or ETFs can't solve certain issues that your high-net-worth clients may face today
- Direct Indexing can help investors with tax management, diversifying concentrated positions or imposing restrictions for a variety of reasons.
- Direct Indexing may help solve investment challenges that requires personalization and tax management
Anyone who came of age in the 1980s or 1990s knows that David Letterman was "must-see" late-night television viewing. His show was a staple for many of our generation. While today the thought of staying up to midnight to watch a TV show is unfathomable, back then I didn't think twice. Of course, the highlight of the show was the Top 10 list when Letterman would read out the usually silly or ridiculous top 10 signs, items or issues on some bizarre topic and the audience would laugh.
So, when I began to write this blog about the main reasons for incorporating Direct Indexing into your client's investment portfolio, I thought I would take a page out of Letterman's book. While my list certainly won't be as funny, nor as long, it might be interesting and maybe just a bit educational.
Let's start by quickly addressing mutual funds and Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). These investment vehicles have served investors well over the years, but they can't solve certain issues that many high-net-worth investors face today. Fortunately, there are other options, such as Direct Indexing, that are available when mutual funds and ETFs aren't able to meet the needs of the individual investor. So with that being said…
The top five reasons you should consider Direct Indexing for an investment portfolio are:
Drumroll please…
#1: Tax management
One of the most common issues for investors is managing the tax liability associated with their investment portfolio. Recent market volatility, along with potential changes coming out of Washington, DC, have led many investors to think more about the tax implications of their investments than they have in the past.
Using a direct indexing strategy can potentially reduce the tax burden of a portfolio and improve after-tax outcomes. Unlike a mutual fund, where the investor cannot take advantage of the individual losses on the stocks in the fund, with direct indexing, the investor owns a basket of individual securities, each with their own cost basis. This allows the investor to sell the stocks that are down and replace them with similar names. The losses taken from the stocks that were sold can be used to offset capital gains now or a taxable event in the future, such as the sale of a business, property or stocks and bonds.
#2: Values-based exclusions
Many clients may want to express a preference. They may want to embrace environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria or socially responsible investing (SRI). Or their need could be as simple as an exclusionary restriction of a single security. Direct Indexing allows investors to their values on their terms. With DI, investors can simply choose the index they wish to replicate and exclude the securities or sectors that do not align with their values. In contrast, with an ESG/SRI-focused mutual fund, the portfolio managers decide which companies to invest in.
#3: Optimal portfolio transition planning
Transitioning to a target portfolio is not as easy as simply selling legacy holdings and buying new securities—especially when taxes are a consideration. An immediate transition, such as selling all legacy holdings while buying a new portfolio, can often leave an investor saddled with heavy tax liabilities and worse off on an after-tax basis. By designing a transition plan using direct indexing, investors can move their existing holdings directly into to the new portfolio, receive a result similar to the index, while dealing with their tax liabilities over a set number of years or with a specific tax budget in mind. This way an investor can have a better after-tax outcome over the course of the transition.
#4: Diversifying concentrated stock positions
More than ever, executives or long-term employees are being compensated in company equity—stock options or grants—and are looking at options to diversify their portfolio. Often these positions will have a low-cost basis, making them hard to get out of without incurring a substantial tax hit. Over time, they represent concentrated holdings based on the size of the overall portfolio. Direct Indexing can provide options to diversify the investor's portfolio. By taking losses in a Direct Indexing portfolio and using those losses to offset gains from the sale of shares from the concentrated position, the investor can more tax efficiently reduce their exposure to the concentrated position and possibly improve the overall risk and after-tax return of the portfolio.
#5: Restricting stock and sector positions
Closely related to Reason #2, is the fact that many investors tend to invest in industries where they work. While they may be familiar with the companies within their sector, this can lead to issues with diversification or even single-stock risk. If an investor who works in the tech industry tends to invest only in tech companies, they are setting themselves up for a potential problem when the sector moves out of favor. By implementing a DI strategy, the investor can choose to replicate an index and simply exclude the sector where they are employed and have an overabundance of exposure.
In summary, this top five list certainly isn't as funny as Letterman's, but if you or your clients are facing investment challenges that require personalization and tax management, Direct Indexing might be an interesting option to explore.
Disclosures
These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and are current as of the date at the top of the page. The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual or entity.
This material is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation to purchase any security.
Forecasting represents predictions of market prices and/or volume patterns utilizing varying analytical data. It is not representative of a projection of the stock market, or of any specific investment.
Nothing contained in this material is intended to constitute legal, tax, securities or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax and investment advice from a licensed professional.
Please remember that all investments carry some level of risk, including the potential loss of principal invested. They do not typically grow at an even rate of return and may experience negative growth. As with any type of portfolio structuring, attempting to reduce risk and increase return could, at certain times, unintentionally reduce returns.
The information, analysis and opinions expressed herein are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual entity.
Frank Russell Company is the owner of the Russell trademarks contained in this material and all trademark rights related to the Russell trademarks, which the members of the Russell Investments group of companies are permitted to use under license from Frank Russell Company. The members of the Russell Investments group of companies are not affiliated in any manner with Frank Russell Company or any entity operating under the "FTSE RUSSELL" brand.
This material is proprietary and may not be reproduced, transferred, or distributed in any form without prior written permission from Russell Investments. It is delivered on an "as is" basis without warranty.
Personalized Managed Accounts (“PMA”) is a program of Russell Investment Management, LLC (“RIM”) and offers customized portfolio management services.
Each Personalized Separately Managed Account is a product of Russell Investment Management, LLC (”RIM”) and is offered through PMA. It represents a composite of model portfolios provided by RIM, in which each composite reflects model portfolios of RIM and third-party investment advisors selected by RIM. When the model is implemented, PMA is a separately managed account program of individually owned securities that can be tailored to meet an investor’s investment objectives. RIM partners with external third-party money managers to offer diversified, single or multi-asset managed accounts that can be customized to the investor’s investment objectives, circumstances and preferences, such as (but not limited to), market exposure, risk management, tax management, environmental, social and governance considerations, and return objectives. Excluding any allocations to pooled investment vehicles, if any, each investor’s account is managed separately from other investor accounts, allowing for a personalized experience to deliver unique investment outcomes.
The decision to use PMA in investors’ portfolios and related investment advice are provided through financial advisors and other financial intermediaries that are independent of RIM and its affiliates. Investors should consult with their financial advisor to determine which services and programs are appropriate to meet their investment objectives.
Russell Investments' ownership is composed of a majority stake held by funds managed by TA Associates, with a significant minority stake held by funds managed by Reverence Capital Partners. Russell Investments' employees and Hamilton Lane Advisors, LLC also hold minority, non-controlling, ownership stakes.
RIM-02715
© Russell Investments
Read more commentaries by Russell Investments
