Energy Stocks, Last Hedge Standing

Summary

In this article, Russ Koesterich reflects on stock market strength amid current geopolitical unknowns and a lack of reliable hedges.

Key Takeaways

Equities advanced in April, but hedges remain few and far between, as traditional risk mitigants like bonds and gold continue to show a correlation with stocks.
In the meantime, energy prices surged earlier in the conflict as the stock market declined, and while paring some gains in April, energy names have more recently been keeping up with the broader market.
It’s important to keep in mind that while energy stocks are currently providing investors with much-needed diversification, the market will likely shift when recession fears start to emerge.

Investors have learned to look past the ongoing war in Iran and surge in energy prices. Stocks have not only recovered but have marked new highs.

Read more: Energy Shock Expected to Hit Prices Harder Than the Economy

In my last post, I suggested that stocks could get past a temporary conflict based on the strength of the economy, U.S. energy independence and the diminishing wallet-share dedicated to energy. I still believe equities can continue to advance, but with markets 12% above the March lows, it’s worth spending a moment on how to hedge gains. In this case, the obvious candidate is probably the right one: own more energy stocks.

Bonds & Gold: No Protection

Before discussing what is working, it is worth highlighting what isn’t. Two traditional portfolio hedges, bonds and gold, are having a tough time. Since the start of the conflict, real 10-year yields, derived from the TIPS market, have risen approximately 0.25%. Not only have yields risen, but on a day-to-day basis, bonds are increasingly moving with stocks. Since the start of the war, the S&P 500 and long duration bonds have had a 0.45 correlation. Rather than mitigating risk, owning bonds has compounded it as investors increasingly worry about the pass-through impact of higher oil to broader inflation.

Gold has performed even worse. Prices have dropped roughly -13%, with the stock/gold correlation rising to approximately 0.50. Here the relationship is a little less intuitive. While gold is often thought of as a hedge against geopolitical uncertainty, as an asset with no cash flow it is also highly sensitive to interest rates, particularly real rates. With rates rising and gold having previously enjoyed a historic run, rising more than 50% from late August through the end of February, investors have been selling gold to de-risk portfolios.

Oil earnings surging

While traditional hedges have not worked, energy stocks have held up much better. From the start of the conflict to the April ‘ceasefire’, the energy sector gained roughly 7.5%, versus around a -4% decline for the broader market. While energy stocks surrendered much of their gains in April, more recently they have been keeping up with the equity rebound. The reason: a surge in earning momentum (see Chart 1). With oil prices higher for longer, earnings momentum is likely to continue.

Chart 1
Global sector earnings momentum
Change in 12m forward earnings estimates (MSCI World Sectors)

Shift when recession fears start to emerge

There is one important caveat to adding energy stocks. If the blockade and supply interruption lasts long enough, concern will shift from inflation to recession. At that time, energy stocks, which benefit from a strong economy and demand for oil, may start to underperform and market dynamics will likely shift to bonds being the better hedge. But in the near term, and assuming no quick resolution to the conflict, energy stocks are likely to prove the rare diversifying asset.

To obtain more information on the fund(s) including the Morningstar time period ratings and standardized average annual total returns as of the most recent calendar quarter and current month end, please click on the fund tile.
The Morningstar Rating^TM for funds, or "star rating", is calculated for managed products (including mutual funds, variable annuity and variable life subaccounts, exchange-traded funds, closed-end funds, and separate accounts) with at least a three-year history. Exchange-traded funds and open-ended mutual funds are considered a single population for comparative purposes. It is calculated based on a Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return measure (excluding any applicable sales charges) that accounts for variation in a managed product's monthly excess performance, placing more emphasis on downward variations and rewarding consistent performance. The top 10% of products in each product category receive 5 stars, the next 22.5% receive 4 stars, the next 35% receive 3 stars, the next 22.5% receive 2 stars, and the bottom 10% receive 1 star. The Overall Morningstar Rating for a managed product is derived from a weighted average of the performance figures associated with its three-, five-, and 10-year 60-119 months of total returns, and 50% 10-year rating/30% five-year rating/20% three-year rating for 120 or more months of total returns. While the 10-year overall star rating formula seems to give the most weight to the 10-year period, the most recent three-year period actually has the greatest impact because it is included in all three rating periods.

A message from Advisor Perspectives and VettaFi: Discover something new! Click here to register for our upcoming webcasts.