Rethinking Trend Investing: Alternative Signals, Not Alternative Markets

Rethinking Trend Investing: Alternative Signals, Not Alternative Markets

In our view, the key is to dig deeper for actionable signals while maintaining liquidity.

Inflation, geopolitical fragmentation and concentrated, AI-driven markets have put a premium on investors’ ability to navigate directional moves across asset classes. We think systematic trend-following strategies can help chart a course. But how they’re designed matters.

Trend following aims to identify and capitalize on discernible patterns across a broad range of markets, whether prices are rising or falling. These systematic strategies, sometimes called managed futures or CTAs, are designed to increase portfolio diversification through their potential to generate returns in both up and down markets .

More Distinctive Signals—Not Just More Asset Classes

For years, though, many managers have sought to enhance trend-following strategies by casting a wider net, hoping that more markets would lead to more opportunities. But there’s a risk to this approach. It may sometimes mean venturing into specialized illiquid markets without doing much to improve diversification.

Managers also often rely solely on structured inputs, such as price and volume, which are easier to analyze systematically across a large universe. We think it’s more effective to diversify the sources of trend alpha by using different types of signals and inputs to enhance returns. In our view, this is preferable to expanding into new and increasingly esoteric markets. These markets may be illiquid and complex—and may not improve diversification or return potential much.

As we see it, an enhanced trend strategy should prioritize the depth of unique and actionable signals—not the breadth of asset classes monitored. In other words, it’s less about alternative markets than it is about alternative inputs.

See more: Stop Selling, Start Planting: The Case for Relational Marketing