Midterms Change Congress, Not the Macro Regime

mid-terms-chg-congress

The big question coming out of the midterms is whether they will change the macro regime itself. The answer is likely no. The forces shaping markets today—tariffs, geopolitics, deficits, and the shift from globalization toward self-sufficiency—are unlikely to be reset by Congress.

Democratic control of Congress may not mean a policy reset

Democratic control of Congress may shift the legislative agenda, but many of the policy levers driving market volatility remain with the executive branch (Figure 1). As a result, while legislative uncertainty may fade, broader policy-driven volatility may persist. Trade policy, in particular, remains an important executive branch tool and may increasingly be used to pursue targeted foreign policy objectives.

See more: How Could the Midterm Results Impact Economic Growth?

fig-1

Will the historical post-midterm pattern hold?

Both US large-cap and small-cap equities historically have posted positive returns after midterms as the political overhang clears.1 This cycle could follow that pattern, especially with resilient earnings and improving economic surprises supporting risk assets.

But a potentially favorable backdrop for equities doesn’t mean all macro risks have faded. Federal Reserve policy, not Congress, will remain the driver of rates. And deficits are unlikely to be meaningfully addressed, given the constraints of the reconciliation process and limited political incentive to tackle spending, tax policy, or public borrowing.