Stop Ranking Clients by Assets Alone

kerry johnson

Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.

One of the advisory teams I coach has a client with $60,000 under management. By traditional metrics, she is a textbook C-tier client. She receives an annual review, a birthday card, and little else.

She has also referred more than $4 million in assets to the firm.

When we calculated the total value of that relationship, the team realized their segmentation model was completely backward. They were rationing time by account size, but account size said virtually nothing about actual value to the practice. If your A and B tiers are built on AUM alone, I suspect you have a few of these high-value clients hiding in your C tier too.

The Problem With AUM-Only Tiers

Most practices segment the same way this team did: $500,000-plus is an A, a middle band is a B, and everyone else is a C. It is simple, easy to pull from a CRM, and measures only one thing: what the client has with you today.

It ignores what the client could bring you tomorrow, who they know, and a factor that advisors rarely admit matters, which is whether you actually enjoy working with them.

The result is predictable. Advisors pour hours into large accounts that never refer business and constantly second-guess advice, while small accounts with wide networks or pending inheritances receive a form letter once a year.