My work has always been predicated upon using quantitative modifiers to enhance portfolio value through greater efficiency of information processing and the creation of momentum-driven asset allocation models. But because so many investors quizzically suffer from a herd mentality, they find it difficult to digest common sense solutions to diffuse problems. And yet, our methodology and its consistent point of view has enabled clients to benefit without compromising investment expectations.
Meanwhile, the search for “meaning” to economic data and forecasts muddies the objective overlay of any discipline worth its value in a cyclical market place. These subtle deviations affect performance, and result in portfolios which still lag the benchmarks, and certainly suffer in comparison to our metrics.
Market crashes inevitably come. The last 3 years of bear mania was not the first such crisis I have seen. While most indices collapsed mightily during that time, history has shown that, after the dust settles, those same indices go on to make new highs. Thus, any rational methodology should be designed to mitigate the severity of downside risk when crisis occurs, and to maximize upside leverage during a period of rebound. Unfortunately, most don’t and you pay the emotional and fiscal price.
Markets.
The economic environment today is still problematic. There are, to be sure, pockets of strength geographically and/or financially. Where imbalances occur, we seek equilibrium. My macro economic forecasts are noticeably stronger today than one year ago. But problems persist and they are embedded in the infrastructure of government, finance, and markets. Deficits create a weight around our ankle; currencies are “uneven” and vex global trading patterns; historical demographics are changing, necessitating a new orientation towards healthcare, agriculture, natural resources, energy, and territorial defense. We cannot ignore the problems, but we might be able to capitalize from them as investors.
In short, we don’t have to have all the answers today. We might not even know the names of companies that could become market titans in the future. We need only to apply our metrics of evaluation, consistently, to come up with the right decisions for a longer view to become successful.
I believe, for example, that successful investments take time to gain traction. A plausible scenario for me would be to identify the macro-opportunity, and to let a company fill the void over time with repetitive earnings. That provides me an outcome that is rational, time-tested, and less panic-driven. It also removes the pain and anxiety of being wrong, like the dot.com enthusiasts, who followed the crowd to an unfortunate catastrophic demise.
The most important questions for investors in the period ahead revolve around how the current climate of fundamentals meld with the psychological climate of mistrust which, I believe, are stronger globally than any set of representative data we have so far analyzed. Although markets have shown a significant rate of acceleration from their lows, nothing has yet moved the meter in changing the appetite for risk and the divide that exists between sophisticated investors and the average citizen. That worries me enormously.
The long view of investing, as I previously alluded, is cyclically positive. The effectiveness of that data, however, is rooted in the stability of the financial system and the transactions of government.
We not only have to battle traditional demographic themes, historical metrics, and market fundamentals, but we need to assuage a global populace that is disinterested in our rhetoric, and still suffering from the effects of the last credit and market debacle they endured. Until we in the industry address that disapproval no fancy television commercials or hyped-up advertising will be sufficient to coerce their dollars, or their trust, back.
Strategy.
As the global credit crisis slowly recedes, our focus shifts from brinkmanship to profit-making. We are impeded somewhat by lower flows of investment capital at the Federal, corporate, and personal level. To be sure, we are “awash” in austerity packages targeted at one sector or another. But the cascade of stimulus money is no replacement for moral leadership in areas such as public health, renewable energy, infrastructure, bio sciences, technology and national defense. The financial industry is in disrepair and, in my mind, a non-factor in the current equation.
Globally, it is inconceivable that nations “can go it alone” in this internet society. The profit opportunities and social needs are borderless. Going to bed hungry is not an option for citizens who hope to build bridges, farm the landscape, invent new technologies. If mere survival is the highest aspiration of a nation, their sights are set too low or we have failed to provide the resources for them to dream bigger.
The gap between rich and poor is widening. Some countries do not experience these disparities, others do to the extreme. Monetary and fiscal policy are not playthings for the few, but a tool for creating bounty for the many. Solutions are not quarterly by nature, nor do they respond to anniversary dates on the calendar. Instead, they are cyclical, generational, and need a generational mindset to transact. Until our sensitivities are heightened to the depth and duration of solution-making Wall Street will continue to respond, inversely, to a 24 hour timeline.
Norms are changing. Our rational approach to yesterday’s problems might not work today. But logic and common sense never become antiquated. That is why everyone intuitively acknowledges the problems, but becomes immobilized by the Herculean effort required to address them.
The last market catastrophe was exacerbated by a failure to address the future, while remaining dispassionate and inert as long as things kept going our way in the short term. Burying our heads this time around is not an option. The creation of moral imperatives is not the “other guy’s” responsibility. Each member of society is part of the fabric of his culture. While we expect bankers and monetarists to exert influence over wholesale financial matters, core moral values reach us in many other ways, and ultimately resonate more deeply than government dogma.
Conclusions.
My raw data is not altogether positive in the short term. Already we have rebounded from valuation lows in a near-linear fashion, making any additional upleg extensions hazardous for late-entry. The alternative, allowing the economy to flatline, would be calamitous. The question is “how long can the market sustain an intermediate, unabated advance in the face of imposing economic circumstances?”
My vision is for the market (and the economy) to focus upon secular themes that offer the highest probability of earnings growth and sustained capital gains. We have seen an acceleration in health sciences equities, but not yet matched by a consistency in earnings acceleration patterns across the board.
Those sectors which offer the next generational upleg opportunity are: alternative energy; agriculture; water filtration; biotech; brick and mortar infrastructure; technology; aerospace; and pharmaceutical research.
History tells us that there is always an upward bias in the stock market. It is the nature of man to be “greedy.” As the fictional character Gordon Gekko once said, “Greed is good.” I agree. But I would add that capitalism has an inherent “morality clause” which can drive greed to be the engine of constructive profit-making, and not the “again and again” mess we continue to fashion from ignorance.
Scotty C. George
(212) 624-1147
The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but is not necessarily complete and it accuracy cannot be guaranteed. It is intended for private informational purposes only. Any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Du Pasquier Asset Management and its affiliated companies and/or individuals may from time to time own or have positions in the securities or contrary to the recommendation discussed herein.
© du Pasquier Asset Management