U.S. Commercial Real Estate: Selectivity in a Range‑bound Environment

SUMMARY

  • We maintain a neutral outlook for U.S. commercial real estate prices overall this year, following a 3% to 5% decline from their 2015 peak.
  • Nonetheless, we believe select but compelling opportunities will abound as bank regulations, public market dynamics and accelerating changes in demographics and technology continue to drive price dislocations.
  • We believe investors should closely monitor real estate investment trusts, foreign capital flows and retail transactions for insight on market conditions.
  • It’s critical to look at the market from all angles, pursue diversification and act flexibly with respect to both asset types and capital structure.

Commercial real estate (CRE) markets in the U.S. will likely remain range-bound in 2018, as moderately positive fundamentals are offset by reduced demand from real estate investment trusts (REITs) and overseas buyers. Nonetheless, selective but compelling opportunities abound. Bank regulations, public market dynamics and accelerating changes in demographics and technology will continue to drive dislocations that flexible investors can seek to exploit, as John Murray and Anthony Clarke explain in the following Q&A.

Q: U.S. CRE prices appear to have done well in recent years. According to RCA, values rose 7% in 2017 and 16% over the last two years.1 Do you agree?

A: No, we believe that overall values have fallen by 3% to 5% from their 2015 peak, chiefly due to declining capital flows into major markets and broader pressures in the retail sector. Some major indexes, which can suffer from lags, or perhaps, selection bias, simply don’t show it yet. Figure 1, in fact, shows how an example real estate ETF suggests prices have fallen since 2015, a stark contrast to the RCA Index. In our 2016 article, “U.S. Real Estate: A Storm Is Brewing,” we outlined why U.S. CRE prices would likely fall.

Consider that the volume of transactions greater than $25 million declined 18% in 2017,2 notably a 59% plunge in New York City.3 The falloff reflects a precipitous drop in demand from overseas investors and the withdrawal of real estate investment trusts (REITs) from the market. Given this, it’s hard to think that values have appreciated.

Finally, as we’ve seen at the ground level through our private investment strategies, there are fewer bidders, aside from the industrial sector. As a result, many owners have taken their properties off the market or refinanced, limiting transparency into where prices have really gone in the past two years.

Q: So could a major downturn be on the horizon?

A: While it’s arguably 2008 in parts of the retail sector, we see minimal risk of a broader, 2008-like downturn over the cyclical horizon. The landscape is quite different. Leading up to the financial crisis, buyers accepted lower and lower capitalization rates in anticipation of higher and higher rent growth. Over the past five years, though, buyers have been accepting lower cap rates because of the broader low-yield environment.

Further, even though financing for cash-flowing assets is once again abundant, underwritten loan-to-value (LTV) ratios for commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) remain 10 percentage points lower (roughly 61% versus 71% LTV pre-crisis)4 with generally more stringent standards for determining value today than in the prior peak. In general, borrowers have more equity in their deals. Furthermore, at the end of 2017, closed-end equity funds controlled over $200 billion of dry powder globally, and over $70 billion more than 2008.5 In the event of a surprise sell-off, we believe this pool of capital would provide a floor under prices.