Investment-grade credit is currently offering impressive yields, with relatively less risk than other fixed income sectors, according to Josh Lohmeier of Franklin Templeton Fixed Income. He makes a case for investing in the space today.
Now that the United States is in the latter stages of its rate-hiking and economic cycle, and from a total portfolio perspective, we believe investment-grade (IG) corporate credit is well positioned to allow investors to play both offense and defense. Given the very low probability of default for IG issuers, this higher-quality fixed income sector can possibly serve as a more defensive position in an investor’s overall portfolio while delivering material income.
Yields are currently higher than the asset class has offered in well over a decade, and approximately 2% higher than the average yield investors have been able to capture since 2010. “Investment grade” refers to a corporate bond that has a credit agency rating of Baa3/BBB- or better, and therefore, lower risk of default than non-investment grade.
IG Bond Yields Are at Their Highest Level Since the Global Financial Crisis
In certain regards, investment-grade corporate credit can also be employed as an offensive tactic within investment portfolios. Currently, US investment-grade corporate yields are higher than the S&P 500 Index earnings yield, a rare phenomenon over the previous 10 years.1 The asset class also has the potential to benefit from certain tailwinds, including potential further tightening in credit spreads supported by positive underlying corporate fundamentals, and eventually falling interest rates if the Federal Reserve shifts monetary policy from restrictive to more accommodative levels. This may allow investors to play offense within the total portfolio context, while still serving the foundational role of high-quality fixed income in delivering diversification and risk mitigation relative to assets with higher historical volatility.
While our view is that the total yield that investors can realize remains attractive (a technical positive that should help further drive demand for the asset class), we generally favor moving up in credit quality and being selective, preferring issuers in more non-cyclical, defensive sectors that are well positioned to exhibit resilience in the face of macroeconomic headwinds.