COP28: Climate Issues Share Center Stage With Oil and Gas

There are material short- and long-term implications for hydrocarbon markets following the COP28 meeting in Dubai, including tailwinds to oil.

We return from the 28th United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP28) with a mixture of optimism and concern, quite natural when trying to mobilize an entire planet to a common cause despite competing interests. While a lot of work lies ahead to realize many of the goals, the commitment to increasing renewables, nuclear generation and efficiency targets, as well as reducing methane from the oil and gas supply chain, could be material in terms of both short- and long-term implications for the hydrocarbon markets1.

The juxtaposition of the COP28 conference (dedicated to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and hosted in Dubai by one of the largest oil-producing nations in the world) beginning on the same day as the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) concluded its delayed semi-annual meeting was one part ironic and one part fitting.

Ironic in the sense that attempts to limit global warming will require a reduction of carbon and methane emissions from producing, transporting, processing and consuming oil, given they are the largest source of global warming gases2. At the same time OPEC+ nations as a whole are incredibly dependent on petroleum revenues and have resisted calls for phase out or even, in some cases, “phase down” of hydrocarbons.

While the debate continues regarding the future of hydrocarbons in the context of the energy transition, the oil industry can play a vital role in reducing greenhouse gases stemming from operational emissions throughout their value chains now. Many oil and gas companies and energy-sector investors have both the technical capacity and balance sheet strength to immediately deploy the new technologies to improve the prospects of limiting global warming in the near-term.

In the short term, the buildout of energy sources away from fossil fuels will be incredibly energy and materials intensive, benefiting demand for commodities, and unfortunately also increasing carbon emissions in the process. Rather than burning methane (known as flaring) which causes emissions, it can be converted into natural gas. So in the long term, creating new supply chains for delivering energy, improving energy efficiency, and trapping unintentional methane emissions from the global supply chain (which are now equivalent to 260 billion cubic metres annually, or about 70% of the annual consumption of Europe) could well have deflationary impulses, particularly for natural gas and coal. Additionally, capturing methane emissions from oil and gas operations (which now amount to about 5% of global greenhouse gas emissions3), could avoid up to 0.1° C of global warming by mid-century, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).4