Tough Choices for Energy Policy

The former U.S. first lady Eleanor Roosevelt once said: “It takes as much energy to wish as it does to plan.” American politicians would do well to devote their energies to planning a sound long-term energy strategy, as opposed to wishing the issues would go away.

The U.S. is the largest oil producer in the world and the second largest source of global greenhouse gas emissions. U.S. oil and gas output hit a record high last year. Fossil fuels remain the country’s dominant source of electricity, accounting for more than half of total generation this year. Job growth related to U.S. fossil fuel production far outpaced that for renewable energy in 2023.

In the 2020 election, Joe Biden positioned climate as a major crisis. When elected, he followed through with several steps. The most notable of these was the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which included hundreds of millions of dollars in clean-energy tax credits and measures to encourage the sale of electric vehicles (EVs).

In this year’s contest, former President Trump and Vice President Harris share the twin goals of lowering energy costs and boosting jobs in the sector. But the two of them have completely different takes on the energy transition and climate risks.

US fossil

Harris seeks to build on the Biden administration’s policies, favoring an expansion of renewable energy. Her policies will include consumer incentives for purchase of domestically-produced EVs and investments in charging stations, along with clean-energy tax credits. However, she has retracted her past support for the progressive Green New Deal proposal and a fracking ban.