Sizing Up Wealth Effects

Sizing Up Wealth Effects

A breeze knocks loose a small piece of ice at the top of a mountain. As it rolls downhill, more and more snow clings to it. Before long, an unstoppable snowball is making its descent.

A snowball effect of asset values can similarly empower wealth effects: the tendency for consumers to spend more as the value of their investments rises. Wealth effects are surprising at first glance: household investments may be illiquid and tend not to produce substantial cash flow. However, a rising net worth builds a consumer’s confidence in their ability to afford purchases.

Households’ two primary investments are typically homes and stocks. Both have had a very strong run in the decade to date: the U.S. FHFA house price index has cumulatively gained 59% since January 2020, while the S&P 500 index has more than doubled. The wealth effect is not directly observable, but asset gains have a statistically significant relationship with personal consumption. Oxford Economics estimates that for each $1 gain in value, the current marginal propensity to consume is $0.04 for equity portfolios and $0.02 for homes.

Wealth effects help to explain some of the surprises in this cycle. Persistent inflation has not deterred consumption, as investments have given consumers a cushion. Labor force participation by older workers has trended down, as appreciating retirement savings equipped them to leave the workforce. The saving rate is holding near historic lows; an asset reserve allows workers to save less of their wage income. And wealth effects are naturally unequal: households with more investments will enjoy greater gains, adding to a feeling of an uneven, K-shaped expansion.

See more: Discipline Through Uncertainty