After the Midterms: High Expectations and “Good Gridlock”

mid-terms



It’s true in both politics and investing: Performance only matters relative to expectations. For stocks, third-quarter earnings season has delivered a blended earnings growth rate of 30.2% year over year, with 60% of companies reporting. Yet those impressive results have been greeted with skepticism and poor stock market performance. There’s no mystery here. Expectations are simply very high.

Meanwhile, a “blue wave” following midterm election results, featuring a substantial Democratic performance, exceeded expectations. That has kicked off a substantial rally. But what, exactly, does the election mean for markets?

See more: Beyond The Midterms

There’s a notion among investors that the stock market loves gridlock: Give it a divided government with limited ability to change rules and regulation, and companies can thrive, as the theory goes. Wouldn’t a Democratic victory of this magnitude, which delivered both the House and the Senate to single-party control again, be viewed negatively by the market?

The answer may lie with market expectations for “good gridlock.” The sheer scale of the Democratic victory was a likely driver of President Trump declaring that he was “absolutely willing to accept those results,” removing much of the threat of post-election chaos and litigation—a clear positive for markets. But the president said something else as well. He declared himself “Mr. Veto.” As a result, gridlock may be alive and well. Thus, the sweet spot for companies may be here—a well-behaved democracy where not much changes. That is perhaps the expectation that was exceeded on election day.

chart of the month